IDFL

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:46 am**

What's up with the 2v2 ladder?

16 teams and only 2 in a challenge?

You are all lucky Laugher is not able to fly. We would murderize ya! :twisted:

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:55 am**

Yea, don't know what's happening.
I would like to see more happening here.
It's a totally different style of fighting when you have a wingman to cooperate with, and is far more realistic than solo dogfights.

Cheers,
Nap

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:21 am**

JUST AN IDEA...

Perhaps allowing enhanced padlock in the first 2 ROE's, just like in the 1v1 rules, would imporve the 2v2 activity.

I would welcome everyone's thoughts on this issue.

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:58 am**

I'm opposed to enhanced padlocking for 2v2. Magical Mark I Eyeball defeats the purpose of communicating with a wingman to work together and build SA by both contributing.

If you're not talking with your wingman, you're wrong. I figured the last lesson you and Buff got would have stimulated more communication and wouldn't need the 'crutch' of enhanced padlocking. :wink:

It's a poor substitute if you ask me.

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:19 am**

I understand the various points being made, but I think the first priority should be to have something happening here.

Since I haven't got the 2v2 Rules back yet, I'm going to assume that they are similar to the 1v1. That is, if both teams agree to fly with enhanced padlock in ROE 1 & 2, then that issue shouldn't be a problem.

I suspect that two factors are in play here:
1) Hard to organise 4 people to be in the same place at the same time,
2) Confidence is preventing people from making an effort.

Cheers,
Nap

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:04 pm**

Perhaps making 2vs2 TIR only will stimulate competition

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:11 pm**

xianzai wrote:Perhaps making 2vs2 TIR only will stimulate competition

I like the idea of both participants agreeing to settings that they prefer, but having standards that are fair for all.

I don't see track-IR ONLY fair for all. :wink:

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:10 pm**

I didn't say fair, I said it might stimulate which nap wants

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 3:11 pm**

How does giving an unfair advantage stimulate competition?

Posted: **Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:43 pm**

Lets do it this way. Start a league for TIR only. TIR can only be used in that league and nowhere else.

BUFF

Posted: **Thu Oct 26, 2006 1:10 am**

Great suggestion Buff.
It should be padlock turned off though instead of TIR only, my error.

Posted: **Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:43 am**

Be sure you turn the fog up so you can actually see what you're looking at. "I need the contrast"..hehe

:wink:

Posted: **Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:53 am**

So my cruch is a bit of water vapor instead of the magical "realistic " 4 key. I wonder which requires more skill!

Posted: **Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:54 pm**

Heh...I'll fly with you with padlock disabled, without TIR, and still kick your ass :twisted:

Posted: **Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:34 am**

predictable